Download our SSCE Study Guide Bundle
Discuss the theme of generational divide in An Inspector Calls.
The theme of the generational divide in An Inspector Calls is central to J.B. Priestley’s critique of society. The play depicts a sharp schism between the older generation (Arthur and Sybil Birling), who represent a hardened, static adherence to individualism and social hierarchy, and the younger generation (Sheila and Eric), who represent the capacity for change, empathy, and collective responsibility.
The most significant difference lies in how the generations respond to the inspector’s interrogation. Sheila and Eric are described by the inspector as “more impressionable.” They display genuine remorse and an ability to change. Sheila immediately regrets her actions at Milwards, acknowledging, “I know I’m to blame—and I’m desperately sorry”. Similarly, Eric admits, “the fact remains that I did what I did.” They accept the moral weight of their actions regardless of the public consequences.
In contrast, Mr. and Mrs. Birling remain fixed in their views. Mrs. Birling stubbornly refuses to accept responsibility, stating, “I accept no blame for it at all.” Mr. Birling is primarily concerned with the potential “public scandal” rather than the moral implications of Eva Smith’s death.
The divide is defined by two conflicting social philosophies. The first is self-interest as embodied by Mr. Birling. In Act 1, he lectures the young men on his philosophy of “hard-headed” business, asserting that “a man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own.” He dismisses the idea of community as “nonsense,” rejecting the notion that people should look after each other “like bees in a hive.”
The second is social responsibility, as embodied by Sheila and Eric who instinctively reject their father’s individualism. When Birling defends his firing of Eva Smith by calling her “cheap labour,” Sheila retorts, “But these girls aren’t cheap labour—they’re people”. Eric supports the workers’ right to ask for higher wages, questioning his father: “Why shouldn’t they try for higher wages? We try for the highest possible prices.”
The divide widens into open conflict in Act 3, after the inspector leaves and Gerald suggests he was an impostor. The parents are immensely relieved and eager to return to business as usual. Mr. Birling mocks the young ones: “the famous younger generation who know it all. And they can’t even take a joke.” They view the evening’s events only in terms of whether they will face legal prosecution or social embarrassment. On the other hand, Sheila and Eric are horrified by their parents’ ability to revert to complacency. Sheila exclaims, “It frightens me the way you talk,” and argues that whether the inspector was real or not, “Everything we said had happened really had happened.” Eric agrees, shouting at his father that “the money’s not the important thing. It’s what happened to the girl and what we all did to her that matters”.
Gerald occupies a middle ground but eventually sides with the older generation. Although he is young (about thirty), his primary concern is protecting his reputation and proving the inspector was a fake to absolve the family of guilt. This aligns him with the static nature of the older generation, leaving Sheila and Eric as the sole bearers of hope for a new, more responsible society.
Receive Literary Updates through our Social Media Channels:
- WhatsApp: Literature PADI or Literature-in-English with LP
- Telegram: Literature PADI
- YouTube: @literaturepadi
- Facebook: Literature PADI
